Function of criticism

 Matthew Arnold's essay titled "The Function of Criticism in the Present Time" puts forth a persuasive case for the significance of criticism in fostering intellectual and artistic excellence. Arnold characterizes criticism as an unbiased pursuit of knowledge, highlighting the necessity for critics to be objective and free from personal and historical biases. He posits that a critic's role encompasses three main tasks: to acquire knowledge, to disseminate the best ideas, and to cultivate a conducive environment for future creative talent.

Arnold's view of criticism is founded on his conviction that the sharing of ideas should be an impartial effort, untethered by national or personal preconceptions. He encourages critics to substantially engage with foreign literature and concepts, acknowledging the benefits of diverse viewpoints in enhancing critical dialogue. This global approach to criticism is commendable, as it recognizes the interrelations of literary traditions and fosters a deeper understanding of cultural influences.

Nevertheless, Arnold's perspective on the function of criticism in advancing literary excellence could be perceived as somewhat excessive. His focus on the necessity for critics to establish a supportive environment for future creative talent raises concerns regarding the interplay between criticism and creativity. Can criticism genuinely influence the trajectory of literary history, or is it simply a reflective activity that reacts to current cultural trends?

Additionally, Arnold's rebuttal of Wordsworth's dismissive stance on critical writing may appear slightly inconsistent. While he defends the intrinsic worth of critical writing, he also implies that critics ought to prioritize the promotion of the finest ideas over their own creative expression. This conflict between viewing criticism as a valuable pursuit in its own right and its functional role in advancing literary excellence is not entirely reconciled in Arnold's essay.

In spite of these critiques, Arnold's essay remains a foundational text in the realm of literary criticism. His focus on the importance of disinterestedness, impartiality, and a cosmopolitan outlook in critical practice continues to impact literary critics and scholars today. Ultimately, Arnold's view of criticism as an essential element of intellectual and artistic life persists as a significant and lasting concept.